Apparently, American students are going to find out. Including kindergartners -- courtesy of, among others, the Department of Defense.
I read this story at Inside Higher Ed, and, uh, well, I do have a comment or two...
Under the plan, President Bush will request $114 million in the 2007 fiscal year, with approximately 75 percent of that amount coming through the State and Education Departments, for the National Security Language Initiative, and the Department of Defense would allocate more than $750 million during the 2007 to 2011 fiscal years to groom skilled personnel in languages deemed critical.
First of all, any post-Nixon use of the term "national security" is automatically suspect. Period, and no apology for that. As evidence, I offer Presidents Bill Clinton and (anyone named) George Bush. Ditto the terms "broad-based" and "initiative," the latter not being a characteristic usually encouraged by anyone in government employ, unless it's to fuck up something that already works.
The president said that his administration’s short-term international strategy is to “stay on the offense,” providing troops, intelligence officers and diplomats with “all the tools necessary to succeed.”
“That’s what people in this country expect of our government,” said Bush. “They expect us to be wise about how we use our resources, and a good use of resources is to promote this language initiative in K through 12, in our universities.”
Yeah...the feds taking the initiative in K through 12 education, as well as universities. Like we don't already have enough problems.
The president then went on to allude to his proposed guest worker program:
Bush also said that “a good use of resources is to encourage foreign language speakers from important regions of the world to come here and teach us how to speak their language.”
Now, if this were true, there would be a whole lot of Anglos in this country speaking Spanish a lot better than they do at present. As it is we already have plenty of private citizens coming here on their own initiative -- citizens of Mexico and Guatemala, but citizens they are -- and I don't know that Americans, by and large, are any less monolingual than we've always been. Unless President Bush agrees with former senator Tom Daschle's famous claim that "you can't professionalize unless you federalize." Now there's a guarantee of effectiveness.
This one puzzled me a bit, too:
Department of State officials stressed the need to have more people master “critical” languages, including Arabic, Chinese, Russian, Hindi and Farsi. Officials, noting that fewer than 2 percent of American students currently study any of the target languages, said that they are critical to national security and cultural understanding.
Rice noted that the “country made a huge intellectual investment in winning the Cold War” and said that in recent years America has not made similar investments, especially surrounding the teaching of critical languages. She added that the countries where the critical languages are spoken “will define the 21st century. Nothing is more important than being able to converse with them in their native tongue.”
So our esteemed Secretary of State believes that speakers of Arabic, Chinese, Russian, Hindi, and Farsi are going to "define the 21st century," does she? While I have no wish to trivialize those languages or those who speak them, I would take exception to that word "define." Spoken by hundreds and hundreds of millions of people in the United States, Britain, and India, it is English which will "define" the 21st century, if it can be said that any language will define it.
Ultimately, I think a lot of the effort aimed at high school and college students will fail. As I see it, it's a matter of motivation. You can use French to pick up girls. Spanish, too. And German. Girls in miniskirts or in tight jeans on the streets of Paris or Lyons, of Juarez or Madrid, of Berlin or Munich. And girls who appreciate a guy's linguistic efforts may just, shall we say, respond with by showing that appreciation.
But Arabic and Farsi are different. Try your language skills on some abaya-clad cutie on the streets of Jeddah or Riyadh or Tehran and you run the risk of having your head cut off. At that point, being able to say "deep doo-doo" in the native language will probably not be enough to do you any good.
Heee. I studied Spanish and went to Spain to learn it. Total immersion is the only way to become fluent or even competent in a language, in my experience.
As for getting picked up by boys, it sure is cute when they cant speak english but try anyway. Awww.
What about the International Language of Love?
Posted by: Marnee at January 10, 2006 10:27 AMMarnee asks, "What about the International Language of Love?"
It ain't Arabic.
Posted by: Craig at January 10, 2006 11:04 AMEsperanto.
Posted by: Marnee at January 10, 2006 02:55 PMOr not.
Posted by: Craig at January 13, 2006 10:25 AMIndia? English-speaking? C'mon Craig, you're a smart guy and you get most things right, but you've overstepped yourself into clueless territory here. I spent a couple years working (and goofing around) in India, and I hardly encountered anybody on the street or in the shops who could speak more than a few words of pidgin English, if even that. Even most of the aspiring businessmen in Mumbai and New Delhi and the urban young people didn't really have a good command of English. Hindi was the language that people were using, even in the southern parts of the country (although, truth be told, it's also a sort of localized pidgin Hindi in the south). Blame Bollywood, if you want, but English is absolutely not India's language-- you'll probably find more English speakers in Japan or Germany than in India.
In fact, in the stats of language speakers in India, English ranks something like 20th or so, behind Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Gujarati, Marathi, and a few others you've probably never heard of. Yes, it is still used by some Parliamentarians and in some of the courts, but decreasingly so with every year. Hindi is replacing it everywhere, and Tamil to an extent in the Indian south. At least I could watch some business channels and read some papers in English when I was there, but Indians themselves don't pay much attention to them-- the most popular and wealthiest TV channels, radio stations and newspapers are now all in Hindi. Even Penguin and some other big book publishers have now switched from English to Hindi as the main language for their books.
As for this country and the big language initiative-- well, Arabic might help in deciphering all those big evil terrorist plans that good ol' Osama's apparently got cooked up for us. Though I agree, international language of love it ain't. This is frankly one reason I never got into the whole Arabic-learning thing, despite the fact that the CIA and FBI now pay mucho moolah for those who know it-- you just can't pick up any chicks with it. And if you do try, you'll, uh, probably pick up Arabic pretty fast for a different reason, i.e. begging for bread crumbs in some ramshackle Arab jail that you'll be tossed into for the unpardonable crime of making eye contact with an Arab woman. (They actually can be kinda hot, just look at Lebanon and all the more secular Arab babes there who don't have to be trapped in a veil or burka 24/7. They look sorta like Greek women but a bit darker and with more exotic lips and eyes. Maybe a little crazier too, but now I'm getting into taboo territory.)
In the US though, Spanish probably would be a good idea. All the big retailers around Chi-town are hint-hinting that their sales force needs to be bilingual (translation-- knowing Spanish helps you look real nice for the boss), and most of the folks on the floor at Sears these days seem to be Latinos or Anglos who can coax the customers in Spanish. Even my neighbors' (very Anglo) kids all seem to be getting enrolled in those popular dual-language instruction programs from grade school so they know Spanish from the get-go. Makes me a little nervous, but hey, that's the world we live in. Hasta luego.
Posted by: Hogan's Gyro at January 16, 2006 10:19 PMYes, I do blame Bollywood -- and the Times of India, the courts, US outsourcing, and cricket. Like Norway, like the Netherlands, India's native language is other than English. But also like them, they need it to survive and to prosper -- and unlike those two nations, India is huge. It's partly because of India that Arabic and Chinese are not going to "define" the 21st century. English is not going to become India's first language, and that's not my point.
I do agree with your points about Spanish and Arabic -- and, next time you're in the middle east, don't miss the Miss Lebanon competition on TV. Oh my...
"Clueless?" I'm cut to the quick here.
Posted by: Craig at January 17, 2006 09:44 AM