Yeah.
Yeah. Please, open your eyes, and read this one, by Ron Liddle in The Spectator:
In the middle of December last year, five police officers turned up at the Welsh home of Nick Griffin, leader of the British National party, and arrested him on suspicion of inciting racial hatred.Griffin was driven to Halifax police station and forced to watch three hours’ worth of his own speeches, which the police had surreptitiously recorded. He was then released without charge, bailed and told to reappear on 2 March this year — precisely at the time campaigning is expected to begin for the next general election. Mr Griffin is standing against David Blunkett, in Sheffield Brightside.
A bunch of other BNP members were arrested at the same time as Mr Griffin. The West Yorkshire police investigation was provoked by a BBC ‘undercover’ programme which revealed the startling fact that some members of the BNP — although not Griffin — clearly harboured racist views. It also showed Griffin talking in a pub and suggesting that Islam was a ‘wicked’ religion.
This programme was shown in July last year and, in a statement following the arrests, West Yorkshire police proudly announced that it had deployed a team of officers on the case ‘five days a week, ten hours a day’ ever since. Now at this point in the article, a really good journalist would tell you how big that team of policemen was. And how much the investigation had cost the taxpayer. And also cross-referenced it with how many burglaries, muggings, etc., had been carried out in the West Yorkshire area from July to 12 December. Especially unsolved ones. But I haven’t been able to find that stuff out: the police won’t tell me. But let’s just remember: a team of police officers, five days a week, ten hours per day.
Granted, that's West Yorkshire in the UK, not anywhere here in the US, but ask yourself: does that not translate? Isn't that a lot of police time, spent on tasks not involving the protection of free citizens? Isn't it something akin to what could happen, and in some fashion, is happening, here?
Earlier this month, I wrote about this proposed law, and I tagged comic actor Rowan Atkinson a free speech hero, which he clearly is.
Mr Atkinson said comedians should be able to make jokes about whatever they wanted. If they went over the top, people would not find their jokes funny. "There should be no subject about which you cannot make jokes."
I should say that this goes beyond jokes: there should be no subject about which you cannot make comment. Period. Or, as our Brit cousins should say, full stop. If that encompasses describing Islam as something evil, then so be it.
Aye, but there's the rub, according to Mr. Liddle:
I got interested in this case after writing an article for the Sunday Times about Blunkett’s proposed law prohibiting people from inciting religious hatred. This is part of the new Serious and Organised Crime and Police Bill, unveiled in the Queen’s Speech. According to Blunkett, it is intended to protect ‘individuals’ rather than ‘ideology’ — but this is a meaningless and disingenuous statement. It’s actually to stop you dissing Islam, full stop. I tried to find out from the Home Office what would constitute an offence under the new Act and nobody could tell me: they haven’t got a clue. I asked loads of times. And then, on 8 December, a Home Office press officer said to me the following:
So, you heard the man: stop dissing Islam, full stop. Now.
Or, well, you'll just have to read the whole thing, won't you?
(Hat tip: lewrockwell.com)
Posted by Craig Ceely at December 31, 2004 11:00 PM